Modern science tends to reckon human being as an imperfect biological constuction, yet endowed with the power of reasoning. In other words, our species are believed to be unbaked properly in the oven of the evolution, a dangerous joke of the Nature, the Nature's crazy children although endowed with intellect.

The obvious advantages of the intellect as well as multiple medical and moral problems of human kind are explained with the stream of strong mutations.

All these notions are absolutely absurd. Human being is beautiful in its nature, and if someone believes in the other, so it is his/her individual problem(s).

I'm convinced that our physical and moral problems are due to not living in proper environment, where our species have formed and where we would feel comfortable without any artificial device. Our intellect allows us to resist the available hostile environment, but all the same we miss our natural homeland. Besides, the wrong lifestyle causes female hormonal disturbance and the sexual mis-selection

Scientists like to use the magic word mutations as an universal clue to any problem of human nature. But this word means only the occasional properties that either help the adaptation to the environment and, accordingly, stay, or hinder and, accordingly, disappear. Our properties help us to resist the surrounding nature and change it, but not to integrate into it. So the mutations that had to form our species would be immediatelly rejected by the natural selection in ordinary natural conditions.

In particular, life of hunters-gethers in African savanna could not form our species as modern science believes. We would feel uncomfortable there without artificial things. Just imagine: heat, thirst, the lack of suitable food, insects, shakes, and finally the wild beasts that we are offered to hunt.

We cannot hunt without artificial devices which we cannot make instinctively. Conversely, we should be the easiest prey for the most of wild beasts. We can neither escape from them nor attack them without the weapon.

We have no hunting instincts. The most of us never dream of hunting. Seemingly, men take hunting and fishing as a possibility to spend weekends or vacations far away from their boring wives, and amusingly, hunter husband is one of the most common avatars of popular jokes about wives' loyalty.

Finally, after the continuous psycholgical tension from the various threats, the life in savanna (as well as in the most of other ordinary natural environments) do not foster human reflecting intellect that requires calm circumstance.

Our biological homeland was to be a peaceful safe area isolated from the rest of the world. Existence of big beasts of prey would be immpossible in such a place because they would quickly exterminate their own food.

For the same reasons the regulation of the reproduction as well as high human moral standards along with the human language (originally the tool of prevention of interpersonal conflicts) were strictly required for the survival in such conditions. Unlimited reproduction as well as egoistic indivedes would lead population to disappearence.

In other words, our original biological environment was to be a place like Yakshas' country (Himalayas), or like Biblical Eden garden where men and women

...were both naked, ... and were not ashamed    (Genesis 2:25)

and having that lost, women

...in sorrow ... bring forth children    (Genesis 3:16)

and every man eats bread

...by the sweat of ... face    (Genesis 3:19)